Supervising lawyers, whether in-house or outside, can profit from giving clear instructions to their charges.  The same goes for general counsel types who oversee the work of law firm types regardless of seniority.

Blawgletter learned that from clerking for a Fifth Circuit judge — The Honorable Jerre S. Williams — going on a quarter century ago.  His Honor favored me and my fellow clerks with a memo that laid out what he expected of us — including hard work, reliability, and integrity.  The instructions gave us confidence and made us want to do our best for him.

Some lawyers in our firm also put together "Tips on Working for Me" memos for those they supervise.  Ideally, the thing should evolve with new insights, technologies, and changes in your practice and preferences. 

Our "Tips" memo did that — evolve — just today.  We offer the latest version for your consideration and improvement.

Tips on Working with Me
Barry Barnett
2/11/08

            1.         Always remember why we have fun and rewarding work to do – because the client needs our help.  We must make top-notch lawyering and service to the client our first priority.  Everything we do follows from that.

            2.         I want you to develop into the best lawyer you have the capacity to become.  You wouldn’t work here if we didn’t believe you have the qualities necessary to succeed.  Everyone – the client, the firm, you, and me – benefits from your progress as a lawyer.  Keep that in mind any time you feel you shouldn’t pester me about something.  You should bother me if it will help the client or help you get better.

            3.         You should feel the same way towards the lawyers who come after you.  Remember that your future success, far more than mine, depends on theirs. 

            4.         I expect you to take the initiative in moving cases forward.  Use your judgment.  Decide what to do and do it.  Challenge yourself.  Get help (from me or others) if you need it, but don’t let worry about making mistakes paralyze you.  You will make mistakes; everybody does.  Honest errors very seldom make a difference in a case, and you won’t lose standing if you own up to your misstep and take care not to repeat it.  Plus you’ll learn faster and accomplish more for the client.

            5.         When preparing any kind of document (memo, letter, pleading, brief) for me, get it in final shape before sending it to me.  You should consider it ready to go out – complete, comprehensive, and with all the polish it could ever need.  I don’t expect perfection, but I do insist on your best work.  Sloppiness drives me nuts – including in things like incorrect citation form, improper punctuation, bad grammar, and misspellings – because I suspect that it reflects inattention, fuzzy thinking, or worse. 

            6.         Send drafts to me as Word attachments to emails.  Make sure to include a date/time stamp and the iManage footer on each draft so I can quickly locate it on the system.  Don’t use an iManage link, which I can’t access from outside the office. 

            7.         I will usually finish off drafts of short items that you send me and get them out myself.  Unless time pressures intervene, I will do my best to make suggestions on improving the draft by putting them in a redline version of the document and sending the draft with redlining back to you via email for further work.  I may add other thoughts in the email.  You should then turn out a new draft and return it to me – in redline so I can see what you’ve changed from your last draft — as soon as you can so I don’t lose track of the project.  You may also bring the draft to me so we can discuss my suggestions and your thoughts about the best ways to improve our work product.  Do it soon, though, because I clear my mind of projects that I’ve finished, and new projects will crowd out my memory of the details of your work product.

            8.         I always have 10-20 cases as well as several case acceptance matters going at once.  When visiting me about a matter, take a few seconds to refresh my memory about it.  A lot of times that reorients my thinking so that I can respond more quickly.

            9.         I want you to consult me any time you want or need my attention, but please make efficient use of my time.

            10.       If you ask me, I will set a time each week when you and I can meet or talk on the telephone.  The session doesn’t have to relate to specific cases.  It could deal with things like an issue you’ve run across in a matter that doesn’t involve me, preparing for a meeting or hearing, business development, or your progress as a lawyer.

            11.       If you don’t understand something I’ve told you or done, ask me to clarify or elaborate.  I may assume you get what I’ve said or done even though I didn’t tell you enough or told you or did something wrong or confusing.  I don’t mind gentle correction.  In fact, I depend on you to help me avoid mistakes.  Do this part of your job especially well!

            12.       I generally prefer to draft case acceptance memos myself.  Sometimes, though, I will ask you to assist.  Usually I will want you to research and add factual details or to insert legal analysis.  I will take care of writing the fee proposal.

            13.       I hold strong views about my own writing.  These include:

                        a.         Dislikes:  passive voice, split infinitives, misspellings, verbs that don’t agree with subjects, legalese, leaving out an open or close parenthesis or a quotation mark, starting a quotation with an ellipsis, block quotes, non-Blue Book citation form, reciting the other side’s argument without – in the same sentence – trashing it, calling parties “plaintiffs” and “defendants” instead of by their names, unimportant facts, failure to check citations, verbosity, unnecessarily repetitive use of a word, burying important arguments or authorities in footnotes, the word “clearly”, phrases like “in the end” or “after all”, personal attacks on opposing counsel, using uninformative headings, and failure to show how the cases that you cite support our position.

                        b.         Likes:  respect for the reader, realizing that the reader doesn’t have much reason to trust you (yet), appreciating that you should therefore aim everything you write at earning the reader’s trust and enhancing your credibility, active voice, conciseness, vibrant verbs, strong nouns, few adjectives and fewer adverbs, synonyms, quoting an especially important or helpful authority rather than paraphrasing it, smooth transitions and strong connections from one paragraph to the next, headings (in briefs) that highlight good facts instead of conclusions, elegant analogies, taking the other side’s arguments early-on and head-on (and not in footnotes, for Pete’s sake!), citing cases whose holdings supports our position, never citing a case just for a good quote, starting with a punchy explanation of why our position should prevail, including (in briefs and memos) a short statement of the case to explain its procedural posture, and a non-argumentative fact section that – despite its apparent neutrality – leaves the reader with the conviction that our side should win.

            14.       By the way, I don’t expect you to write precisely as I do.  You shouldn’t.  You have your own voice.  Most lawyers never find theirs, and many of those who do discover it through hard work and trial and error.  Parker Folse writes beautiful prose but in a style very different from mine.  Pick up from me (and others) anything you find useful and discard the rest.

            15.       You can contact me any time.  Email usually works best, but feel free to call me in the office, on my cell phone, or at home if you need to.

            16.       Err on the side of over-informing trial team members, especially clients, of developments in their cases.  Assume, unless they or I say otherwise, that clients should get a copy of everything that comes into or goes out of our offices, including letters, briefs, pleadings, and memos.  You shouldn’t write anything that you wouldn’t want the client to see.

            17.       If you make a mistake, fess up pronto.  Trying to hide errors can make them more dangerous, increase your stress, and hurt your effectiveness; it also turns you into a liar.  Getting the truth out quickly, on the other hand, nips the problem in the bud and enhances your trustworthiness.

            18.       Keep emails to me short.  If something requires that much explanation, call me or see me about it in person.  Don’t assume that I’ve read long emails.

            19.       Clients want me to stay on top of their cases.  I need your help in doing that.  If you think a document or issue needs my close attention, note that in a message to me, either in an email or a voicemail or on the routing slip, or pay an in-person visit to alert me to the situation. 

            20.       I will generally route emails and other documents that come to me first to the entire trial team, often without comment.  If I think of something that I want a trial team member to do in response, I will put it in an email or ask him or her to see me to discuss the assignment.

            21.       After a deposition, email to me and the other trial team members, including the client (unless a protective order provides otherwise), the highlights of what happened.

            22.       Notify me as soon as possible if you think you can’t meet a deadline or have a conflicting assignment.  I will understand if you alert me in time to make alternative arrangements.  I might not if you don’t. 

            23.       I love for you to seize the initiative in moving cases forward and to make tactical decisions on your own.  Charge!  In the rare instance of a problem that you can’t resolve yourself, take a few minutes to think through possible solutions and recommend a course of action.  That will help me focus on the alternatives and will help you learn how to deal with similar problems in the future.

            24.       Avoid fights with the other side.  That goes double for discovery disputes.  If a dust-up looks likely, let me know promptly.  The problem may result from dealing with lawyers who don’t have enough experience or authority to work things out reasonably.  My intervention with a more senior lawyer on the other side may resolve the issue.

            25.       I expect you to keep track of the deadlines in each case we work on together, to familiarize yourself with the terms of all case management and protective orders, and to possess near-encyclopedic knowledge of the applicable rules of civil procedure and of the forum’s local rules.  Many times associates ask me a question that they could have answered themselves if they had consulted one of these basic sources.  If I ask you what the applicable rule says about a legal issue that you’ve contacted me about, let’s hope you don’t have to say you don’t know!

            26.       Never treat anyone with disrespect, no matter how disrespectfully he or she has treated you.  Pigs like mud fights and especially enjoy getting you dirty too.

            27.       Always, always, always tell the truth.  Always.

            28.       We work in a profession whose best practitioners excel in divining creative solutions to problems.  A lot of the process goes on inside our heads.  If you want to learn more about the creative aspects of lawyering, ask a senior lawyer to talk through the act of creation, which you may think of it as strategizing.

            29.       If you want or expect me to attend or participate in a conference call, meeting, hearing, or other event, send me an Outlook invitation that includes the necessary details.  That way, I can put it directly on my Outlook calendar by “accepting” the invitation.

            30.       Suggest ways to improve this memo.

            31.       Have fun.

Feedicon14x14_2 Our feed works for tips.

Print:
Email this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Barry Barnett Barry Barnett

Clients and colleagues call Barry Barnett an “incredibly gifted lawyer” (Chambers and Partners) who is “magic in the courtroom” (Who’s Who Legal), “the top antitrust lawyer in Texas” (Chambers and Partners), and “a person of unquestioned integrity” (David J. Beck, founder of Beck…

Clients and colleagues call Barry Barnett an “incredibly gifted lawyer” (Chambers and Partners) who is “magic in the courtroom” (Who’s Who Legal), “the top antitrust lawyer in Texas” (Chambers and Partners), and “a person of unquestioned integrity” (David J. Beck, founder of Beck Redden).

Barnett is a Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, and Lawdragon has named him one of the top 500 lawyers in the United States three years in a row. Best Lawyers in America has honored him as “Lawyer of the Year” for Bet-the-Company Litigation (2019 and 2017) and Patent Litigation (2020) in Houston. Based in Texas and New York, Barnett has tried complex business disputes across the United States.

TRIAL COUNSEL
Barnett’s background, training, and experience make him indispensable to his clients. The small-town son of a Texas roughneck and grandson of a Texas sharecropper, Barnett “developed an unusual common sense about people, their motivations, and their dilemmas,” according to former client Michael Lewis.

Barnett has been historically recognized for his effectiveness and judgment. His peers chose him, for example, to the American College of Trial Lawyers and American Law Institute. His decades of trial and appellate work representing both plaintiffs and defendants have made him a master strategist and nimble tactician in complex disputes.

Barnett focuses on enforcement of antitrust laws, the “Magna Carta of free enterprise,” in Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall’s memorable phrase. “Barry is one of the nation’s outstanding antitrust lawyers,” according to Joseph Goldberg, a member of the Private Antitrust Enforcement Hall of Fame. Named among Texas’s top ten antitrust lawyers of 2023, Business Today calls Barnett a “trailblazer” among the “distinguished legal minds” who “dedicate their skill and expertise to the maintenance of healthy competition in various sectors” of the Lone Star State’s booming economy. Barnett is also adept in energy and intellectual property matters and has battled for clients against a Who’s Who list of corporate behemoths, including Abbott Labs, Alcoa, Apple, AT&T, BlackBerry, Broadcom, Comcast, Dow, JPMorgan Chase, Samsung, and Visa.

Barnett commands a courtroom with calm and credibility and “is the perfect lawyer for bet the company litigation,” said Scott Regan, General Counsel of former client Whiting Petroleum. His performance before the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend prompted the Court to withdraw the question on which it had granted review. The judge in a trial involving mobile phone technology called Barnett “one of the best” and that his opening statement the finest he had ever seen. Another trial judge told Barnett minutes after a jury returned a favorable verdict against the county’s biggest employer that he was one of the two best trial lawyers he’d ever come across—adding that the other one was dead.

COMPLETE PACKAGE
A versatile trial lawyer, Barnett knows how to handle a case all the way from strategic pre-suit planning to affirmance on appeal. He’s tried cases to verdict and then briefed and argued them when they went before appellate courts, including the Second, Third, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits, the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and (in the case of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend) the Supreme Court of the United States.

Barnett is a sought-after public speaker, often serving on panels and talking about topics like the trials of antitrust class actions and techniques for streamlining complex litigation. He also comments on trends in commercial litigation and the implications of major rulings for outlets such as NPR, Reuters, Law360, Corporate Counsel, and The Dallas Morning News. He’s even appeared in a Frontline program about underfunding of state pensions, authored chapters on “Fee Arrangements” and “Techniques for Expediting and Streamlining Litigation” (the latter with Steve Susman) in the ABA’s definitive treatise on Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts, 5th, and commented on How Antitrust Enforcers Might Think Like Plaintiffs’ Lawyers.

HARD GRADERS
Clients and other hard graders have praised Barnett for his courtroom skills and legal acumen.

A client in a $100 million oil and gas case, which Barnett’s team won at trial and held on appeal, said Barnett and his team “presented a rare combination of strong legal intellect, common sense about right and wrong, and credibility in the courtroom.” David McCombs at Haynes and Boone said Barnett “has a natural presence that goes over well with juries and judges.”

Even former adversaries give Barnett high marks. Lead opposing counsel in a decade-long antitrust slugfest said “Barry is a highly skilled advocate. He understands what really matters in telling a narrative and does so in a very compelling manner.”

CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
Barnett relishes opportunities to collaborate with all kinds of people. At the Center for American and International Law (CAIL), founded by a former prosecutor at Nuremberg in 1947 and headquartered in the Dallas area, he has served on the Executive Committee, co-chaired the committee that produced CAIL’s first-ever strategic plan, supported CAIL’s Institute for Law Enforcement Administration and other development efforts, and proposed formation of a new Institute for Social Justice Law. CAIL’s former President David Beck said “Barry is extremely bright” and is “very well prepared in every lawsuit or professional task he undertakes.”

Barnett is also a Trustee of the New-York Historical Society, a Sterling Fellow at Yale, a member of the Yale University Art Gallery’s Governing Board, a winner of the Class Award for his work on behalf of his college class, and a proud contributor to the Yellow Ribbon Program at Harvard Law. Barnett’s pro bono work includes leading the trial team representing people who are at greatest risk of severe illness and death as a result of being exposed to the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 while being detained in the Dallas County jail—work for which he received the NGAN Legal Advocacy Fund RBG Award.

At Susman Godfrey, Barnett has served on the firm’s Executive Committee, Employment Committee, and ad hoc committees on partner compensation, succession of leadership, and revision of the firm’s partnership agreement. He also twice chaired the Practice Development Committee.

KEEPING PERSPECTIVE
Barnett understands that clients face many pressures. Managing the stress is important, especially in matters that take years to resolve. He encourages clients to call him whenever they have a question or concern and to keep the inevitable ups and downs in perspective. He wants them to know that he will do his level best to help them achieve their goals. He also strives to foster trust and to make working with him a pleasure.

Cyrus “Skip” Marter, the General Counsel of Bonanza Creek in Denver and a former Susman Godfrey partner and client, said Barnett is “excellent about communicating with clients in a full and honest manner” and can “negotiate for his clients from a position of strength, because he is not afraid to take a case through a full trial on the merits.” Stacey Doré, the President of Hunt Utility Services and a former client, said that Barnett is “an excellent trial lawyer and the person you want to hire for your bet-the-company cases. He is client focused, responsive, and uniquely savvy about trial and settlement strategy.” A New York colleague said, “Barry is a joy to work with as co-counsel. He tackles complex procedural and factual hurdles capably, efficiently, and without drama.”

SUPERB CLIENTS
A wide range of industry leaders have entrusted their critical matters to Barnett, including the ones you see below.

Public Companies:

Alaska Airlines
Encana Oil & Gas
Hinduja Global
KKR & Co. Inc.
Neiman Marcus
Talen Energy
Texas Instruments
Vistra Corp.

Private Companies:

Duane Reade
Elliott Investment Management
Luminant Generation
Morris & Dickson Co.
Oak Hill Capital

PERSONAL
Barnett’s wide-ranging experience and calm, down-to-earth approach enable him to connect with clients, judges, jurors, witnesses, and even opposing counsel. He grew up in Nacogdoches, Texas. He co-captained his high school varsity football team as an All-East Texas middle linebacker while also serving as the Editor of Key Club’s Texas-Oklahoma District, won the Best Typist award, took the History Team to glory, and sang in the East Texas All Region Choir. As Dan Kelly of client Vistra Corp. put it, Barnett is “a great person to be around.”

Barnett is steady and loyal. He has practiced at Susman Godfrey his entire career. He and his wife Nancy live in Dallas and enjoy spending time in Houston and New York. Their daughter works for H-E-B in Houston, and their son is a Haynes and Boone transactions lawyer in Dallas.

As a member of Ivy League championship football teams in his junior and senior years at Yale and a parent of two Yalies, Barnett has no trouble choosing sides for “The Game” in November. And he knows how important fighting all the way to the end is. On his last play from scrimmage, in the waning minutes of The Game on Nov. 22, 1980, he recovered a Crimson fumble.

Yale won, 14-0.

Honors & Distinctions

Academy of American Legal Writers, Board Member (2012-2023).
American College of Trial Lawyers, Fellow (2014-2023).
American Law Institute, Elected Member (2007-2023).
Benchmark Litigation, Litigation Star (2022, 2023, Euromoney)
The Best Lawyers in America, Houston Lawyer of the Year in Patent Litigation (2020) and Bet-the-Company Litigation (2017 and 2019), Bet-the-Company Litigation (2010-2024), Class Actions (2015-21), Commercial Litigation (2003-2024), Litigation – Antitrust (2012-2024), Litigation – Intellectual Property (2012-2024), and Litigation – Patent (2012-2024) (Copyright by Woodward White Inc.).
Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business in Antitrust and General Commercial Litigation(2007-2024).
Martindale-Hubbell AV (highest) rating (1995-2023).
Lawdragon, The Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers (2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024), Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024), Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators (2022, 2023)
Legal 500. Antitrust: Civil Litigation/Class Actions (Plaintiff) (2021, 2022, 2023); Energy Litigation: Oil and Gas (2023)
Recognized as a Top Ten Antitrust Lawyer in Texas, Lawyer Awards 2023, Business Today (2023, Unstructured Media).
SuperLawyers. Texas (2003 – 2023, Thomson Rueters)

Clerkship

Honorable Jerre S. Williams, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Education

Harvard Law School (J.D., cum laude)
Yale University (B.A., Economics and History (honors), magna cum laude)

Bar Admissions
New York
Texas
Court Admissions
United States Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
U.S. District Courts for the District of Arizona
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Publications
On Twitter @contingencyblog
On LinkedIn
Fee Arrangements, Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts, 5th
How Antitrust Enforcers Might Think Like Plaintiffs’ Lawyers, Law360
Barry Barnett — NPR “Marketplace” Report
Oral argument in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

Interviews by and articles for Law360, NPR’s “Marketplace” report, Law Blog of The Wall Street Journal, Texas Lawyer, ABA Journal, business torts “Hot Topics” by the Litigation Section of the Texas Bar Association, Global Competition Review, The Hartford Courant, Kansas City Business Journal, The Dallas Morning News, Texas Cable News, D CEO, and Dallas Business Journal.

Author and speaker at continuing legal education seminars, including “One Year Later: Winter Storm Uri and Its Impact on Civil Litigation and the Energy Industry’, ‘Force Majeure Meets Covid-19: A Love Story”, “Reasonable Prudent Operator—The Continuously Evolving Standard” and “The Hottest Oil & Gas Claims” at the Institute for Energy Law’s Annual Oil & Gas Law Conference, “Current Issues in Multidistrict Litigation and Class Actions” at the Third Circuit Judicial Conference; “Daubert in Class Certification Hearings: The Standard After Comcast” for ABA Section of Antitrust Law; and “Current Developments in Business Litigation”, American Bar Association

Leadership & Professional Memberships

American Bar Association; Section of Litigation and Section of Antitrust Law; American Association for Justice; Dallas Bar Association; Federal Bar Association; Houston Bar Association.
Center for American and International Law, Executive Committee (2016-24) and Trustee (2011-2024). Yale Club of Dallas; Harvard Club of Dallas; Yale Club of New York City.
Greenhill School, Addison, Texas, Trustee (2007-2013).
New-York Historical Society, Trustee (2016-2024) and Chairman’s Council (2012-2024).
Life Fellow, American Bar Foundation, Texas Bar Foundation, Dallas Bar Foundation, and Houston Bar Foundation.
Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, Connecticut, Member, Governing Board (2023-2024).