Would a lawyer dare use a law blog to try to affect the outcome of an appeal?
A Note in the April edition of Stanford Law Review makes the case for worrying. See Rachel C. Lee, Ex Parte Blogging: The Legal Ethics of Supreme Court Advocacy in the Internet Era, 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1535 (2009).
Blawgletter once in awhile hears from a judge about something we've written. Nothing bad, of course, and nothing about a specific case.
But each time it happens it reminds us that we — you – never know who will read what goes out into the ether.