A federal jury in Kansas City yesterday found that Vonage infringed a Sprint Nextel patent on Internet phone calls and ordered it to pay $69.5 million.  WSJ story here.  Vonage suffered a similar verdict earlier this year at the hands of Verizon.  See Bon Vonage.

Speaking of verdicts in intellectual property cases, Blawgletter

Per the WSJ, the Supreme Court today granted certiorari to decide "whether a patent holder can seek royalties from multiple companies as a patented product works its way through the manufacturing process."  Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 2007 WL 2768020 (U.S. Sept. 25, 2007).   Specifically, the cert. petition asks:

Columbia University President (and lawyer) Lee C. Bollinger yesterday concluded his remarks about, and to, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with these words:

I am only a professor, who is also a university president, and today I feel all the weight of the modern civilized world yearning to express the revulsion at what you stand for. 

The Federal Circuit yesterday reversed a preliminary injunction that barred a patent holder from threatening potential infringers with litigation.  GP Industries, Inc. v. A Gutter Solution, LLC, No. 07-1087 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 20, 20007).

The patent holder, Eran Industries, sent letters in which it vowed to take "all necessary steps to stop the infringement"