After a summer hiatus, the Texas Supreme Court returned to the work of deciding cases today.  It issued seven opinions

The defendants won every one.  And, in four of the seven, the court acted without hearing oral argument.

Big deal, right?  Maybe the defendants deserved to win.

Barry Barnett

Feedicon14x14 Happy Friday.

At Blawgletter’s house, we call the Whole Foods Market up the street "Wholey Foods" — which sounds like "holy foods".  Sometimes we get their mash of avocados and other makings into guacamole.  Delicious!

Yesterday, the D.C. Circuit cleared the way for Whole Foods to smuch rival Wild Oats into its organic foods empire.  The court’s

The Third Circuit today ordered remittitur of a $30 million punitive damages award to $750,000.  The district court had already reduced the punies to $2 million.  But the court of appeals held that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment couldn’t abide more than about a 7:1 ratio between actual damages ($109,000) and punitive

The First Circuit today vacated an order granting a motion to compel arbitration under a clause that included prohibitions on class arbitration, awards of multiple damages, and a one-year limitations provision.  Distinguishing Kristian v. Comcast Corp., 446 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 2006), the court held that the class arbitration and multiple damages provisions didn’t present

Blawgletter somehow missed the survey that the American Association for Justice — the main trade group for plaintiffs’ trial lawyers — commissioned on attitudes about civil justice from Peter D. Hart Research Associates.  It came out last month.  And guess what?  Most people worry more about corporate irresponsibility than lawsuit abuse.

For example:

  • 55 percent

Wholefoods
Blawgletter’s favorite Whole Foods Market.

Blawgletter alerted you yesterday to the D.C. Circuit’s order staying the acquisition of Wild Oats by Whole Foods.  We now have the per curiam order. It says:

Upon consideration of the emergency motion of the Federal Trade Commission for an injunction pending appeal, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it

Today, the Seventh Circuit upheld a lender’s right to require a borrower to pay for the privilege of repaying the loan early.  The promissory note barred pre-payment unless the borrower also forked over a "yield maintenance" fee.  The borrower paid before the loan matured but balked at ponying up the fee.  It later relented but

Nathan Koppel over at the WSJ has penned a first-rate article about hourly rates — specifically those at or about $1,000.  He describes lawyers’ reluctance to go to four figures while noting those who’ve overcome the feeling.  And he points to one of Blawgletter’s partners, who told Mr. Koppel that he charges $1,100 an hour

Today, the Fifth Circuit upheld dismissal of a securities fraud complaint for failure to plead facts sufficient to raise a "strong inference of scienter" — that the bad guys intended to defraud purchasers of stock.  The court considered an array of allegations but found each of them individually and and all of them collectively too