Blawgletter hesitates, prudently we think, to criticize the rulings of judges, especially those of the near-omnipotent federal kind.  And yet yesterday a ruling by the Seventh Circuit tempted even the cautious us.

The case, we think, related to caps.  The plaintiff, American Needle, once proudly stitched National Football League teams' logos onto headgear, but the

Can you name anything less attractive than than someone’s claiming justification for an opinion with something along the lines of I told you so?

Blawgletter can’t, off the top of our head, either. And yet we now juxtapose our post about the need to dismantle Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the following WSJ

Blawgletter once again learned something new today.  The Federal Circuit — as it often does — furnished the instruction.

You’ve probably Googled your way to Wikipedia articles, right?  And in the process you’ve likely also viewed images and listened to music that someone has granted an "open license" that permits people to use within limits. 

Today, the Ninth Circuit reversed the dismissal of a securities fraud complaint for failure to plead "loss causation" adequately under Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336 (2005).  The putative class of Gilead Sciences shareholders alleged that a decline in sales growth resulted from issuance of a Food and Drug Administration "warning letter"