The U.S. Supreme Court today held that state and federal courts sitting in State A lack the power to compel someone who resides outside of State A to answer a lawsuit in State A unless the out-of-stater did something that caused harm in State A. Hurting a person who lives in State A won't do it. You pretty
Nevada
Quote of the Day: Frank Easterbrook
By Barry Barnett on
Fusion was not deceived, hornswoggled, misled, duped, hoodwinked, bamboozled, or snookered.
Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC v. Ham, No. 09-3723, slip op. at 5 (7th Cir. Aug. 2, 2010) (Easterbrook, C.J.) (applying Nevada law and explaining that Fusion couldn't recover attorneys' fees owing by a corporate "husk without any corn inside" from the husk's…