Decisions by appeals court have started to slow as the judges work through backlogs and adjust to remote oral arguments, remote conferences, and home offices with yappy dogs and bitey cats. The Week of May 4 produced 7 opinions that rated tweets on @contingencyblog, most of them dealing with intellectual property. Your Commercial Appeals
Here are the Commercial Appeals Roundups for the weeks of April 20-24, 2020 and April 27-May 1, 2020. The Roundups describe a key aspect of precedential appellate rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, the 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the highest appeals courts in Delaware, New York, and Texas and provide links directly to …
Here’s the Commercial Roundup: Appeals for the week of April 13-17, 2020. As you’ll see, it went heavy on intellectual property and procedure, the latter including rulings on arbitration awards and class (de)certification.
Have a great week. We’ll see you again next Monday.
- Voluntary dismissal without prejudice didn’t trigger right to fees for
The Contingency is slow off the mark this Monday, but it’s not because federal and state appellate courts reduced their output due to COVID-19 last week. That may change as social distancing measures postpone live hearings, but so far so good.
- Article III standing test required more than risk of misdiagnosis or mistreatment
COVID-19 didn’t slow the appellate courts last week, as you can see from the 16 entries below.
- Race must “motivate” decision not to make contract under 42 U.S.C. 1981. https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-
- Fifth Circuit will rehear case on constitutionality of CFSB en banc. http://ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/18/18-60302-CV1.pdf… and http://ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/18/18-60302-CV0.pdf
- You can’t
- Light bulb maker could grant distributor a copyright sublicense to use licensor’s photos of light bulbs without saying so and as matter of
In this time of concern and disruption over Covid-19, I and my colleagues at Susman Godfrey (SG) are busy taking steps to safeguard our firm family while continuing to be proactive in protecting the interests of our clients and moving matters forward as necessary and appropriate. I hope that you, your colleagues, and your families…
- Magistrate judge can’t rule on whether to appoint receiver. http://media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/18-1405P-01A.pdf
- Inventors‘ hiding their offer to sell oil recovery method from USPTO invalidated patents. http://cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/16-2231.Opinion.3-2-2020_1543098.pdf
- Patent infringement that doesn’t happen until after importation supports exclusion order. http://cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/18-1450.Opinion.3-2-2020_1543049.pdf
- Facebook users had standing to sue over misuse of URL data in their
- Buyers of auto parts didn’t agree to arbitrate antitrust claims against suppliers by taking on Limited Warranty servicing duties. https://opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/20a0053p-06.pdf
- Comcast must answer monopolization claims in case over local cable ads markets. http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2020/D02-24/C:18-2852:J:Hamilton:aut:T:fnOp:N:2477274:S:0
- Rampant use of Western Union’s money-transfer system to commit fraud didn’t give rise to strong inference that execs
- Expert’s claim of “stigma” to land value from gas pipeline didn’t pass Rule 702 muster. https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/183126p.pdf
- Letter that implied lessee paid royalties to wrong entity didn’t meet notice requirement of Louisiana statute. http://ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/19/19-30396-CV0.pdf
- Presence of servers in district didn’t count as regular place of business under patent venue statute. http://cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/