Per the WSJ, U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman today spurned a government attempt to block Whole Foods from eating Wild Oats.  The Federal Trade Commission asked Judge Friedman to enjoin the merger.  He took 93 pages to say no.

Blawgletter would link to the opinion, but the court filed it under seal to protect

Shareholders of Sonus Networks sued in Massachusetts state court to recover damages to the company.  The state court dismissed the case "without prejudice" for failure to plead a precondition to suit — "futility" of demanding that Sonus bring the action on its own behalf.  The shareholder refiled in federal court.  The district court dismissed because

Josepadilla

A federal jury in Miami today found Jose Padilla and two co-defendants guilty on all counts.  Washington Post story here.

The government charged the three of aiding al-Qaida and other Islamic extremists overseas.

In May 2002, then Attorney General John Ashcroft accused Padilla of planning to detonate a "dirty bomb" in the U.S.  President

The Washington Post reports that a federal jury in Miami has reached a verdict in the criminal trial against Jose Padilla and two co-defendants.  The government charges them with supporting al-Qaida and other Islamic extremists overseas.

The jury deliberated for a day and a half after a three-month trial.

The court will read the verdict

A wit scrawled the title of this post in a library carrel.  It plays on two Greek names — Euripides and Euminides — and makes sense only if you say it out loud.  You-rip-a-dese pants, you-men[d]-a-dese pants.

Blawgletter wishes that Administrative Law Judge Roy Pearson had the wit to heed the common sense of the

The WSJ reports that a Florida jury awarded $170 million in actual damages against audit firm BDO Seidman for gross negligence.  The plaintiff, a Portuguese bank, alleged that BDO botched its audit of a Miami financial services company, Bankest, by failing to detect Bankest executives’ fraud.  The scheme led to Bankest’s bankruptcy, criminal convictions, and

A 2-1 Third Circuit panel today reversed a summary judgment in a price-discrimination case under the Robinson-Patman Act.  The majority held that the district court erred by requiring too much proof of "competitive injury".

Michaels Foods, a supplier of egg and potato products, negotiated to charge below-list prices to Sodexho, a food distributor, but charged