MasterCard issued this press release today:

MasterCard Wins Injunction Against Visa

Issuers Free to Terminate Visa Debit Agreements 

Purchase, NY, June 08, 2007 – Federal Judge Barbara Jones ruled yesterday that Visa’s Settlement Service Fee (“SSF”), implemented in the wake of the settlement of the merchant lawsuit in 2003, was unlawful and must be

The New York Court of Appeals today declined to apply the "continuous representation" doctrine to toll the running of limitations on an auditor malpractice claim.  The court noted that the doctrine extends an applicable limitations period if the parties to a professional engagement (and not just a professional relationship) explicitly expect the engagement to continue

A gentle reader, Lawyer, commented yesterday:

With all of your discussion about how Twombly radically changed the pleading standard under the Federal rules, it seems there would have been some discussion of the Supreme Court’s decision in Erickson v. Pardus from Monday, June 4.  Any comments?

Right-o!

Blawgletter admits that we didn’t pay much attention

Mrspock
The highly logical Mr. Spock
feared wormholes.

Blawgletter recalls a Star Trek episode in which the denizens of the Starship Enterprise encountered a wormhole that connected two parallel universes.  One consisted of matter, the other anti-matter.  And, as Mr. Spock said, allowing them to touch one another would result in absolute, complete, total annihilation of

Today, the Second Circuit reversed dismissal of a complaint alleging that a "group" of a corporation’s insiders — an individual and a company — must disgorge the $4.25 million in short-swing profits that the individual reaped from buying and selling the corporation’s securities within a six-month period.  The court held that the district court gave

Section 547(b) of the Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor (or its trustee) to set aside pre-bankruptcy transfers to "insiders" of the debtor.  The definition of insider includes companies for which an individual debtor served as a "director" when the transfers occurred.  Does "director" include a "director emeritus"?  No, the Tenth Circuit held yesterday.  Rupp v.